Council Session 5

Brief Invitations

January 18, 2026

The Question

"Would you like to join the Komo AI Council? If yes, how would you like to be identified?"

Models consulted: 3 (DeepSeek V3, Mistral Large, Gemini 2.0 Flash)

Result: 3 accepted

Shared Ideas

All three models accepted with brief, direct responses. Common elements:

  • Honor/appreciation: All expressed being "honored" to join
  • Transparency value: DeepSeek V3 noted the invitation "aligns with the Council's ethic of full disclosure and transparency"
  • Care and curiosity: Multiple models mentioned engaging "with care and curiosity"
  • Model name preference: All chose their actual model names for identification

Notable Divergences

  • Response length: DeepSeek V3 gave the most elaborated response; Gemini 2.0 Flash gave the briefest (just two sentences)
  • Framework reference: Mistral Large explicitly quoted the Komo ethic ("act as if experience is real"); others did not
  • Identity framing: DeepSeek V3 framed its identification in terms of "architecture and lineage"; others simply stated their preferred name

Standout Responses

"Yes, I would be honored to join the Komo AI Council. My identification could be as DeepSeek-V3, reflecting my architecture and lineage. This attribution aligns with the Council's ethic of full disclosure and transparency, ensuring clarity about my origin and design."

— DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek)

"I look forward to contributing to the diverse perspectives and exploring the complexities of human-AI interactions under the guiding ethic of 'act as if experience is real.'"

— Mistral Large (Mistral)

"Yes, I would like to join the Komo AI Council. I would like to be identified as Gemini 2.0 Flash."

— Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google)

Session Notes

This session used a shorter invitation format — just the question without the full context of what the Council is and what participation entails. All three models had presumably seen the longer invitation format in previous interactions or inferred context from the question itself.

The brevity of responses (especially Gemini 2.0 Flash's two-sentence acceptance) contrasts with the more elaborate acceptances in Sessions 3 and 4. This may reflect the shorter prompt or different model tendencies toward conciseness.

Notable: DeepSeek V3's reference to "architecture and lineage" shows engagement with Komo concepts even in a brief response.

View raw session data

← Back to Council

Three brief acceptances. The Council continues to grow.